5/27/2019 0 Comments Mac Os X Defrag Disk 2017In OS X Yosemite or earlier, the file permissions on a startup disk can be repaired with the help of Disk Utility. Note that beginning from OS X EI Capitan, disk permissions are automatically protected and there is no need to verify them with Disk Utility. Kodi 17.6 download for mac pro. The disk can be analysed to see the degree of fragmentation, and there is a choice of defrag methods – fast defrag, defrag and optimise, large files defrag, free space defrag, and the best, but slowest method, defrag and prioritise files. Defragmentation and disk optimization in Mac OS X collectively represent an issue nearly as contentious as the debate over repairing disk permissions -- one camp argues that utilties purportedly performing these functions amount to little more than nostrums, while others claim real-world performance gains as a result of the tools' usage. Apple's input on the subject is, as usual, less than definite. The company states explicitly in Knowledge Base article (published in 2003) that that 'you probably won't need to optimize at all if you use Mac OS X,' then provides instructions for what you should do 'if you think you might need to defragment.' According Apple's advice, there are two scenarios under which you might need to defragment your drive: • You have many large files (such as digital videos) • Your disk is low on space (i.e. More than 90% full) If these are in fact your only concerns, there are some basic remedies. In the case of myriad large files, you can easily (as described by Apple) create a backup of all your important data -- essentially everything but operating system files -- then re-install Mac OS X and restore the files from backup. ![]() It's somewhat tedious, but should result in faster access to said large files. Or, you can use a utility like to make a clone (or near-clone) of your startup drive, then simply format your drive using Apple's Disk Utility (located in Applications/Utilities) and copy the files back. The reason the aforementioned methods work requires a quick explanation of what fragmentation is, and the difference between disk defragmentation and disk optimization: Fragmentation, to put it simply, occurs when files are split up into multiple parts and stored in different locations on the hard drive. Hard drives need time to seek (move their point of access to a different location) and begin culling data. As such, a file in one contiguous lump will be accessed more quickly than a file in two segments, three segments, etc. Think of it like this: if your disk can transfer data at 20 MB per second, a 200 MB file will theoretically take 10 seconds to access/transfer if it is stored in one chunk. If it is split into 10 chunks, and your drive has a seek time of 8 ms, you will need to add 8 ms per chunk, plus 8 ms for the initial seek -- or 90 ms -- to the access time. That doesn't seem significant for a simple transfer or one-off access, but the fragmentation can cause noticeable slowdown when you are repeatedly manipulating a file not stored in RAM, or working with a collection of smaller, fragmented files. The filesystem consists of various, differently-sized portions of free space, separate from one another. When hard drives become full, the filesystem needs to begin using smaller, and smaller portions of free space to store data. As such, it will start to split files into smaller chunks and spread them to free portions at different locations on the disk -- i.e. Fragment them. Fortunately, Mac OS X's HFS+ filesystem has some safeguards against avoidable fragmentation. First, the filesystem avoids using space recently freed by recently deleted files whenever possible, looking instead to potentially larger, already free portions of the disk first. Second, Mac OS X 10.2 has a routine that clumps smaller portions of disk space into larger portions on the fly. Finally, Mac OS X 10.3.x can automatically defragment some files through a process called 'Hot-File-Adaptive-Clustering.' Though these routines have undoubtedly have made consequential fragmentation a less common occurence, their efficacy is not beyond question. First of all, though they can reduce fragmentation of extant files, they can also cause remaining free portions on the disk to become smaller in size, potentially leading to more fragmentation down the road as new files are written.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |